How to measure visceral fat?
There are three main ways to measure the amount of visceral fat in your body, including diagnostic imaging, bio-electrical impedance, and waist circumference measurements. They various methods all have trade-offs in terms of cost, accuracy, and convenience. The following article briefly examines the cost, accuracy, and convenience of various methods, as well as other trade-offs.
A. MRI / CT scans
Accuracy: Extremely accurate. With proper companion software, MRI's are able to give near exact measurements of visceral fat area
Cost: $199 (at MRI Pathways) to several thousand
Convenience: Low, scanning has to be done at a imaging facility.
Summary: The gold standard of visceral fat measurement in terms of accuracy. MRI's also have no radiation, however cost and convenience can be an issue for many individuals however.
B. Bioelectrcial impedance (BIA)
Accuracy: Varies by machine, but only somewhat accurate, comparable to estimating visceral fat from waist circumference or BMI2.
Cost: Devices that can "measure" visceral fat generally cost at least $50 dollars and are most commonly produced by Omron and Tanita.
Convenience: Very convenient, since scanning can be done at home after the purchase of a machine.
Summary: Bioelectrical impedance devices can be useful to roughly estimate if you have a healthy or unhealthy level of visceral fat but should not be used to estimate your exact visceral fat amount.
Cost: Devices that can "measure" visceral fat generally cost at least $50 dollars and are most commonly produced by Omron and Tanita.
Convenience: Very convenient, since scanning can be done at home after the purchase of a machine.
Summary: Bioelectrical impedance devices can be useful to roughly estimate if you have a healthy or unhealthy level of visceral fat but should not be used to estimate your exact visceral fat amount.
The first bioelectrical impedance devices used a harmless electrical current to estimate the amount of water in your body and approximate your body fat percentage. More recent devices use electrical currents of different frequencies to estimate the amount of visceral fat3. Some studies, have found accuracy levels similar to those of MRI's, but others have found accuracy levels similar to that of waist circumference measurements. In fact, one study found that "visceral fat" impedance devices were essentially measuring waist size instead of visceral fat. In my personal experience using an Omron device and MRI scanner, Omron visceral fat measurements are up to 30% off. For example, in my most recent comparison, I had ~110 cm^2 of visceral fat at the belly button level and my Omron device (pictured above) estimated ~80 cm^2.
C. Waist-to-hip ratio and waist circumference
Accuracy: Individuals measurements are not very accurate. But high waist-to-hip ratios and large waist circumferences are signs of high levels of visceral fat
Cost: Very low, any tape measurer will do
Convenience: Extremely convenient
Summary: Waist-to-hip ratio and waist circumference are a good method to determine if you have unhealthy levels of visceral fat.
Cost: Very low, any tape measurer will do
Convenience: Extremely convenient
Summary: Waist-to-hip ratio and waist circumference are a good method to determine if you have unhealthy levels of visceral fat.
40 year old male with very high levels of visceral fat and BMI of 25. Fat appears white on an MRI. |
Circumference measurements of the waist and hip are quick, easy, and inexpensive ways to determine if you have unhealthy levels of visceral fat. These tests can be performed by anyone with only a tape measurer. To calculate your waist circumference, place the tape measurer over the belly button parallel to the floor. The hip circumference is measured across the largest protrusion of the buttocks. Visceral fat levels are likely excessive for waist circumference measurements larger than 40 inches for men and 36 inches for women. Similarly, waist to hip ratios higher than 1.0 for men and 0.85 for women are considered dangerous.
References Cited:
1. http://jap.physiology.org/content/97/6/2333.full#ref-list-1
2. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1038/oby.2010.71/pdf
3. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2858179/
4. http://weightology.net/weightologyweekly/?page_id=218
5. http://www.itochu.co.jp/en/news/2011/110822.html
No comments:
Post a Comment